止歇歡娛,今天此時,讓我們躺在時間的河流上,採用他們慣常的姿勢,感知他們的所在和請求,察覺我們的對話與諾言。 在他們走後,沒有一個夜晚能讓我們安睡。可三年來,我們謹記並警醒我們的原則。五月是悲哀的,又是清醒的。通過對他們的取態,丈量我們與人類的距離。祝願 大地上的神祇同樣能保佑他們,就像他們保佑我們一樣。祈禱彼岸樂土。伏食尚饗。
止歇歡娛,今天此時,讓我們躺在時間的河流上,採用他們慣常的姿勢,感知他們的所在和請求,察覺我們的對話與諾言。 在他們走後,沒有一個夜晚能讓我們安睡。可三年來,我們謹記並警醒我們的原則。五月是悲哀的,又是清醒的。通過對他們的取態,丈量我們與人類的距離。祝願 大地上的神祇同樣能保佑他們,就像他們保佑我們一樣。祈禱彼岸樂土。伏食尚饗。
雞蛋仔事件:(1)一買一賣你情我願,本身就係制造滿足感的經濟活動。當年有多少小販養活家人,今天為何要禁。(2)法例也可以有不合理的,不合理就要改,就那麼簡單。(3)幾十個高薪人員去拉一個自力更身搵幾千蚊糊口的人,除了情何以堪,亦證明現在此法例制度正在鼓勵資源錯配,就應該改。(4)雞蛋與高牆,幫雞蛋,is always a better bet …
黃毓民辭職演辭全文
社民連立法會議黃毓民原訂今日在立法會發表辭職聲明,但因建制派議員離席,令會議流會,未能宣讀聲明。
以下為黃毓民發言的全文:
為義受壓迫的人有福了!
– 黃毓民議員就議事規則第28(A)條作出的個人解釋
一、
主席,首先感謝你批准本人及其餘四位辭職的議員發言,藉此將我們辭職的理由,存照於立法會紀錄,成為香港立法機關歷史文獻的一部分。
本人一直深信,香港市民並非只是簡單定義的經濟動物。港人是有政治理想的。2003年的「七一大遊行」,就是港人努力捍衛自由民主的價值的最好例證。如今香港的民主發展,已經滯後於當世所有已發展地區,本人生逢其時,身在其位,實在無法逃避這一代人對民主運動的承擔,上承「七一精神」,投入新一波的民主運動,為打破困局而勇於嘗試,是以,我們權衡輕重,才決定辭去議會席位,觸發補選,造成「變相公投」,將政制發展決定權還給香港人。 Continue reading
今天晚上打完球,和朋友回家路上的一席話,令人稀墟。
打從暴動起一直至 97 年,香港人營營役役,但總算不愁沒有工作,有學歷就有向上的機會,勤力的可以做大排檔做小販創業,樓價不會暴跌,生活還算安穩。97 年後,貧富差距擴大,機會減少,連擦鞋匠也要趕絕,工廠消失但新移民越來越多。雖然經濟大氣候的轉變是其中一個原因,但官商勾結,功能組別毒害管治乃此問題的根本死結,但政府仍然頑固不堪,不顧社會整體利益去改善管治,而是走向相反的方向去強化與利益集團的關係。
現在好像吵鬧不斷,但香港人的聲音很簡單,只希望將這個不公義的體制改變,希望反映給當權者知道此種不公義的毒害,但現在的既得利益者有意將這些聲音標籤為反中亂港不愛國,變成市民與中央政府的矛盾,從而更加強化自己的買辦地位,其心可誅!
香港人一直和中國血肉不離,不要再屈香港人不愛國。香港人沒有懷念英國人,香港人懷念的是英國人管治時候的生活。奈何 97 回歸後生活沒有變好,更出現了一班窮凶極惡的買辦站在香港人與中國之間。該批人士才是真正的反中亂港!
最近有一個 IT 界的「閉門」會議討論政改,拒記者於門外也。得知 IT 界的譚偉豪議員,似乎已經將選舉時說「我支持取消功能組別」的說話忘記,也有一些資深 IT 人用一些歪理去支持功能組別的繼續存在甚至擴大,去企圖擠身入中港買辦的行列中。有一些事情,真的無話可説,不要以爲這些 IT 人懂邏輯,利益在前,邏輯可以忘記。搵食重要,但做人匆匆數十年而已,已經好食好住,爲何不可以說一些合乎邏輯的説話呢?
2010 年 1 月 1 日 香港爭取民主遊行的一段小插曲 @ 00:20.
我是營運互聯網服務的,本想寫 ISP 題目,但想深一點,題目多不知怎選,況且我的意見未必人人認同,加上最近社會爭拗多,還是放下小我好一些。
近日鬧得熱哄哄的話題都是很好的學校辯論題目,包括校園驗毒、網上援交廣告應否立法規範、「o靚模」應否於書展出現、淫管條例、互聯網過濾系統等等。我當然有我自己的看法,但我覺得我對這些個別事情的看法完全不重要,因為一個成熟的社會一定有辯論的正方反方,沒有那一邊是“更對的”。我想說的反而是,為甚麼我們好像沒完沒了的辯論也沒得一個了斷:我相信深層裡正是那個非常老掉牙的「普選」問題。
香港人普遍都很理性,明白社會有不同意見,但為甚麼年來都好像那麼吵吵鬧鬧呢?我想是因為沒有一個大家也覺得心悅誠服的決策制度。行政長官掌握很大權力,但只是由八百人選出來,而這八百人絕大部份不是市民大眾選的;立法會則只有一半直選,加上分組點票制度連這一半也閹割掉,令民意於議會得不到完全反映。如果閣下有看立法會直播,你聽得最多的應該是主席曾鈺成說:“由於議案未能在兩個組別獲得過半數票贊成通過,我宣佈議案被否決”。其實他也應該會覺得悶。
我想,正因為這決策制度,結果是無論怎樣決定都一定有人吵,因為正反相方壓根兒都不服氣。慢慢呢,變成了鬥吵,誰吵得大聲誰贏:“碇蕉”事件正是一例,每年的七一遊行是另一例。我相信“碇蕉”事件、粗口事件等等只是表象,問題的根源是為甚麼有市民支持這些舉動。我想是因為沒有普選,決策制度令正反相方都不服也。
爭取普選是「I T呼聲」(IT Voice)組成的最大原因。我們不是甚麼政治學者,而是一班真正“落手落腳”的I T人,真心相信普選對香港好,令香港真正和諧。我們當然高興普選有時間表,但仍希望更快達到雙普選,結束香港這吵吵鬧鬧的狀態。更重要的,是不要搞一個假普選出來,否則吵鬧會更甚。
新聞見下 …
胡錦濤借中國人錢比納米比亞買自己個仔胡海峰公司的產品,大家有咩感想?
更奇怪係納米比亞呢個亞非拉友國向我國借錢竟然仲大做文章,莫非佢地比我國更重法治?
更更更奇怪係,中國有納稅人竟然話,”美國佬都係咁啦!!” 好似佢唔使納稅兼有份分咁。Well, 我無言以對,唯有話美國人可以選總統,美國可以容納 Michael Moore,撐兩咀打圓場 ….
各位兄弟,此風於我國已是正常狀態,並已經吹到香港多時,大家執生啊 …
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25810295-2703,00.html
Hu Jintao’s son linked to Namibia graft
Rowan Callick, Asia-Pacific editor | July 21, 2009
THE son of Chinese President Hu Jintao has been dragged into a corruption scandal in Africa involving a security scanning company, Nuctech, which he headed until last year.
The Anti-Corruption Commission in Namibia believes corruption was involved in a $69 million deal the Namibian government agreed with Nuctech for scanners for its ports and airports.
The commission has arrested Chinese citizen Yang Fan, Nuctech’s African representative, and two influential Namibians, Teckla Lameck and Kongo Mokaxwa, who own a consulting company, Teko Trading, with which Nuctech has signed contracts. They are all being held in custody.
The commission’s director, Paulus Noah, says he wants to question the Chinese leader’s son, Hu Haifeng, as a witness, to learn about the business practices of the company, originally called the Nuclear Technology Company.
“Of course, if he can make himself available, I will be happy,” Mr Noah said. “I would like to know how they do business in China.”
China provided the funding for the scanning equipment on the condition the contract was awarded to Nuctech.
It is being alleged in The Namibian newspaper, that $5 million was channelled through Teko Trading to political players in the country as a reward after the contract was confirmed.
The Namibian High Court has placed a restraint order on a range of assets, including houses, cars and money in banks, alleged to have been obtained as a result of corruption involving the deal. This prevents the assets from being sold or moved while the order remains in effect.
Mr Hu, aged 38, was president of the company until being promoted to party secretary — and thus overall boss — of Tsinghua Holdings, which was founded six years ago to oversee the operations of a group of state-owned high-tech companies spun out of Qinghua University in Beijing, one of China’s most prestigious universities.
President Hu attended the science powerhouse Qinghua University, from which his son gained a master’s degree in engineering physics.
Nuctech’s troubles in Namibia demonstrate the potential downside of China’s strategy of zou chu qu — go global.
This is designed to obtain access to strategic resources internationally and to accelerate the growth of Chinese businesses into global corporations.
But it exposes Chinese companies to the risk of getting into trouble for operating in ways which, while routine at home, may be deemed corrupt overseas.
Within China, the taizi — princelings or children of the communist party elite — are almost guaranteed immunity from questioning by the party’s disciplinary commission, and are beyond the reach of the state’s legal apparatus.
They frequently return from overseas education, especially in the US, with business qualifications and swiftly take leading roles in core state-dominated strategic sectors of the economy.
Members of the family of former premier Li Peng are prominent in power generation, while the son of former president Jiang Zemin is prominent in telecommunications, and the son of former premier Zhu Rongji is running the China International Capital Corp.
But “going global” exposes them to the kind of risks now becoming apparent in Namibia — in a story echoing around Africa.
Nuctech became well-known within China when on the eve of the Beijing Olympic Games last year it won the contract to provide the ticket scanning equipment for the capital’s greatly expanded subway network.
The company had earlier won a multi-billion- dollar tender to supply 147 Chinese airports with security scanners. It has exported its products to more than 40 countries, including to the Australian Customs Service.
A deal with The Philippines Customs Bureau — for which financing was to be provided by China’s Export-Import Bank, and which also involved the Bank of China, both state-owned institutions — proceeded despite controversy about the lack of a tenders procedure.
http://hk.news.yahoo.com/article/090721/8/db23.html
胡錦濤長子捲入貪污案被捕3嫌明出庭
(法新社)2009年7月22日星期三01:50
(法新社納米比亞溫厚克21日電)官員今天表示,兩名納米比亞人和一名中國人明天將出庭面臨貪污指控。本案涉及向一家公司採購機場安全掃描器材,而這家公司與中國國家主席胡錦濤的兒子有關連。
中國國有的威視股份有限公司(Nuctech)與納米比亞政府簽約,提供總值5530萬美元的安全掃描儀器,由胡錦濤於2007年訪問納米比亞時允諾提供的貸款支付。
胡錦濤的長子、38歲的胡海峰擔任威視的總經理直到去年,當時他升任清華同方集團(TsinghuaHoldings)的黨委書記,清華同方集團掌控威視和其他逾20家公司。
法院官員告訴法新社,「包括中國威視的非洲地區代表楊帆(YangFan,譯音)等3人,22日將在高等法院出庭,向法官聲請保釋。」
該法院官員又說,「自從被捕以來,3人一直被關押在牢內。」
繼納米比亞反貪污委員會(Anti-CorruptionCommission,ACC)查獲,採購13台掃描儀器的頭期款1280萬美元已支付給太戈貿易公司(TekoTrading)後,楊帆和兩名納米比亞人拉邁克(TecklaLameck)和莫科薩瓦(JerobeamMokaxwa)上週被捕。
調查人員表示,太戈貿易是由拉邁克和莫科薩瓦共同擁有,且那筆錢據稱是促成這項採購案的「顧問費」。(譯者:中央社劉學源)
2009 年 6 月 11 日
筆者的工作是營運互聯網服務,客人在香港的網站於國內突然看不到是偶有發生的事情。原因是多個網站可能共用一組IP位址,如果其中一個網站被國內的「防火長城」隔斷,所有於同一組IP位址的網站也可能會被隔斷。因為IP位址有限,此情況現時還是無可避免。服務供應商和客人唯有自行對網站作「政治審查」,將高低風險的網站分放於不同的IP位址,盡量縮小被打擊面。不要以為很敏感的網站才出問題,有時候「防火長城」會神經質地將學校網站也趕絕。此情況也發生於電郵傳送上,例如客人於國內收不到公司的電郵等等,客人現在對此也見怪不怪了。
最近國內有新猷,乃中國政府要求所有於境內銷售的個人電腦預先安裝一個叫「綠壩-花季護航」的軟件。據報此軟件的作用是為兒童阻隔「不良訊息」,由政府委托一生產商設計及生產,政府為用戶支付首年的授權費,聽說從第二年起用戶要自己付費。筆者沒有仔細研究「綠壩」,不敢妄下結論,但國內網民一定會有疑問,例如:「不良訊息」由誰去定義?除了色情暴力賭博,還有甚麼是不良訊息?網民大部分不是兒童,為甚麼要規定全部電腦都必須安裝軟件?網民的資訊選擇會否更被剝奪?還有,此「綠壩」會否記錄和報告網民看過甚麼網站?可以想像此「綠壩」必會引起熱烈討論。
此事於國內其實是常態,「政策」是也,營商者應該深有體會。從商業角度看,國內外軟件公司一定會對此「綠壩」政策大叫不公平;從用戶角度看,軟件免費看似沒甚麼,不喜歡可以重灌電腦,但其實此政策有抹煞其他競爭者的效果,最終是消費者的選擇會減少。可不要小看「政策」的威力,筆者有一個朋友,他的程式員 (programmer) 全在國內聘請,但他受過一點「政策」苦頭後,毅然把主要的伺服器 (server) 都放在香港。
最近曾特首於國內發言,要求沿海省市多給些經濟機會予香港,我聽後覺得有點心酸,也覺得曾特首此舉捉錯用神。經濟以利為先,利不彰者皆空談。那個 “server” 朋友的故事令我想到,香港是個沒有「綠壩」的法治地方,這正正就是香港的優勢。為香港好,我們首要認清楚香港的價值核心是甚麼,還要懂得去保護和進一步發展它。當然,這包括堅持不要有像「綠壩」這一類的政策。希望曾特首明白此道理,看清楚香港的相對優勢是甚麼,不要搞錯方向。
葉旭暉
Edited on 25 June 2009
Credit to ATV: www.hkatv.com
Submission from Hong Kong Internet Service Providers Association to Panel on Information Technology and Broadcasting of the Legislative Council of Hong Kong
Changes to the Governance Structure of Hong Kong Internet Registration Corporation
31 March 2009
Hong Kong Internet Service Providers Association (HKISPA) represents Internet Service Providers (ISPs) in Hong Kong.
In connection with domain name operation and governance of .HK, ISPs in Hong Kong are generally helping their clients to register domain names and provide them with related auxiliary services. We are therefore concerned about the governance structure of HKIRC as it is currently the registry and the only registrar of the .HK domain name.
The current composition of the board of HKIRC is that government appoints 4 of the directors, service providers elect 2, and domain name users elect the remaining 2. This structure effectively offers minimal control of the corporation to service providers and users, about which HKISPA is very concerned.
We learned that HKIRC is a non-profit organization, but HKIRC is accumulating a substantial reserve of tens of millions of dollars. That reserve basically is the proceeds from domain name users and indirectly from service providers. However, the current composition of the HKIRC board effectively bestows no control to users or service providers on how that reserve is to be used. Service providers or users also have no control on how .HK domain names are priced. We are therefore advocating a bigger portion of the board seats to be elected by service providers and users.
In addition, HKISPA has been advocating the domain name registry-registrar model for .HK through service provider directors of HKIRC. This model has been proven beneficial to users, service providers and the registrar, and adopted by vast majority of domain names in the world including .CN, the domain name of China. However, HKIRC has been moving exceptionally slow in adopting this model. We are of the opinion that it is slow because users and service providers do not have sufficient representation in the board, and that the administration who has the biggest influence to the board, which is more so now as it appoints half of the directors, has no direct incentive to make that happen. This is governance issue.
We think that service providers, users and the government should have equal representation in the board. That could be achieved in a simpler way by increasing the representation of service providers and users by two seat respectively, making the composition of the board with 4 government appointed directors, 4 service provider directors, and 4 user directors. Alternatively and more ideally, the representation can also be 3 appointed directors, 3 service provider class directors, and 3 user class directors.
Similar views have been in the past expressed by HKISPA and through service provider class directors to the board of HKIRC and during the public consultation period.
ENDS
About Registry-Registrar Model
A Registry-Registrar model creates competition in the domain name registration, such that end users will benefit from the competition, service providers can offer registrar service, and the registry will have increase in number of domain names.
If the model is applied to .HK, HKIRC will become the registry, and it provides service to a number of registrars, who in turn directly serve domain name users. The registry manages a fair playing field to all the registrars. The registrars compete for customers by their own means on pricing and service features.
Currently, there is no registry-registrar model adopted by .HK. HKIRC is the only monopoly registry and registrar for .HK.
About Hong Kong Internet Service Providers Association
HKISPA is an industry organization with its full members holding PNET licenses issued by OFTA. PNET license is basically a license required for a company to operate Internet Service in Hong Kong. HKISPA currently has more than 80 members, including most of the major ISPs in Hong Kong.
孩子︰
你的來信我已收到,對你在大學里的表現,我很欣慰,你要再接再厲。 既然你選擇了一定要走仕途這條路,你就一定要把我下面的勸告銘記在心︰
1、不要追求真理,不要探詢事物的本來面目。 把探索真理這這類事情讓知識分子去做吧,這是他們的事情。要牢牢記住這樣的信條︰對自己有利的,就是正確的。實在把握不了,可簡化為︰上級領導提倡的就是正確的。
2、不但要學會說假話,更要善于說假話。 要把說假話當成一個習慣,不,當成事業,說到自己也相信的程度。妓女和做官是最相似的職業,只不過做官出賣的是嘴。記住,做官以後你的嘴不僅僅屬于你自己的,說什麼要根據需要。
3、要有文憑,但不要真有知識,真有知識會害了你。有了知識你就會獨立思考,而獨立思考是從政的大忌。別看現在的領導都是碩士博士,那都是假的。有的人博士畢業就去應招公務員走向仕途,那是他從讀書的那天起就沒想研究學問,肯定不學無術。記住,真博士是永遠做不了官的。
4、做官的目的是什麼?是利益。要不知疲倦地攫取各種利益。有人現在把這叫腐敗。你不但要明確的把攫取各種利益作為當官的目的,而且要作為唯一的目的。你的領導提拔你,是因為你能給他帶來利益;你的下屬服從你,是因為你能給他帶來利益;你周圍的同僚朋友關照你,是因為你能給他帶來利益。你自己可以不要,但別人的你必須給。記住,攫取利益這個目的一模糊,你就離失敗不遠了。
5、必須把會做人放在首位,然後才是會做事。這里的做人做事你可別理解為德才兼備的意思。這里說的做人,就是處關系。做事是實際工作,這點會不會都無所謂。做人就是把自己作為一個點編織到上下左右的網中,成為這個網的一部分。記住,現在說誰工作能力強,一點都不是說他做事能力強,而是指做人能力強。呵呵,你看那些把能力理解為做事的人,有好日子過才怪。
6、我們的社會無論外表怎樣變化,其實質都是農民社會。誰迎合了農民誰就會成功。我們周圍的人無論外表是什麼,骨子里都是農民。農民的特點是目光短淺,注重眼前利益。所以你做事的方式方法必須具有農民特點,要搞短期效益,要鼠目寸光。一旦你把眼光放遠,你就不屬于這個群體了,後果可想而知。要多學習封建的那一套,比如拜個把兄弟什麼的,這都不過分。
7、要相信拍馬是一種高級藝術。千萬不要以為拍馬只要豁出臉皮就行,豁得出去的女人多了,可傍上大款的或把自己賣和好價錢的是極少數,大部分還是做了低層的三陪小姐。這和拍馬是一樣的道理。拍馬就是為了得到上級的賞識。在人治的社會里,上級的賞識是升官的唯一途徑,別的都是形式,這一點不可不察。
8、所有的法律法規、政策制度都不是必須嚴格遵守的,確切地說,執行起來都是可以變通的。法律法規、政策制度的制訂者從沒想到要用這些來約束自己,而是想約束他人。但你要知道,這些不是人人都可以違反的。什麼時候堅決遵守,什麼時候偷偷違反,讓誰違反,要審勢而定,否則寬嚴皆誤。
以上這些都是做官的原則。現在要仔細想想,如果你真能逐條做到,你就能一帆風順,如果感覺力不從心,你還是馬上另外選擇職業吧。
Comment: 該信具有較高的理論價值和應用價值,實為官場金科玉律 ,符合付諸史館的標準;該信觀點鮮明,論述坦率樸實,語言精煉,警句頻出,振聾發憒,境界高超,足可編入教科書當範文,聊以糾正當今假話空話套話充斥的文風。當然,該信有感而發,屬即興之作,邏輯上欠推敲,然白玉微瑕,瑕不掩瑜也!
Reference: http://www.admin5.com/article/20080923/105504.shtml
寬頻及電郵已經是所有企業的必要設施。因電郵成本低,很多大中小企業也常用電郵發放推廣訊息。如果你也用電郵推廣,本文一定要讀。
大部份電郵推廣人員都有一個”訊息不平衡”問題,看到電郵的方便,但看不到互聯網服務供應商或電郵服務提供者(這裏統稱ISP)及電郵接收者的角度,因而可能達不到最佳的推廣效果,甚至適得其反。
首先,ISP不是逢推廣電郵都不歡迎,ISP提供的正是溝通服務,沒有電郵ISP的存在價值會大減。但ISP要顧及所有客戶的電郵需要,例如如果其中一個客戶發放大量電郵而令該ISP被其他電郵服務提供者拒收,該ISP的所有客戶都會受影響。因此,傳送方的ISP通常都會設定一個合理的傳送限制,而有些ISP更會選擇於傳送前過濾垃圾電郵及病毒,以確保不會跌入黑名單因而影響整體客戶服務。
但如果客戶用自己的電郵伺服器直接收發電郵又如何呢?這就牽涉到接收方ISP的電郵過濾系統了。經過多年的發展,現時的電郵過濾技術已經比往日先進很多。除了相對靜態的黑名單外,ISP已經用動態的統計方法(Bayesian Inference)去偵測大量電郵,而該方法包含對電郵的特性及數量、頻率、寄件者及IP位址、郵件上的超連結(hyperlink,相當於該電郵賣甚麼)等等的統計。如果一間公司的電郵被接收方的ISP標籤為垃圾電郵,該公司的電郵往後被過濾的機會會相應提高。反之,如果被標籤為非垃圾電郵則往後被過濾的機會會減低。這些動態的統計方法都有開放源碼的軟件可用,電郵伺服器管理人員可自行研究及安裝。
另外,比較新一點的發展是現時國際間有部份ISP已經有特別的網絡去共同偵測大量而大致相同的電郵。例如一個電郵在很短時間內發放了很多封,該電郵的數碼指模及數量、寄件者、IP位址及郵件上的超連結資料等等會即時出現於該網絡上令所有該網絡的ISP知悉。而各ISP亦會將被客戶投訴的電郵通過此機制通知其他ISP。大部份電郵用戶端軟件(如Thunderbird、Outlook等)都是用類似的方法去過濾電郵,亦同時從客戶收集垃圾郵件資料。現時未有一個此類形網絡專給本港的ISP共用,但部份ISP已經利用了一些海外的此類形網絡。
因此,電郵推廣人員已不可再有一個舊觀念,認為如寄一萬個電郵有一百個有人看等於十萬個有一千個讀者。相反,寄得愈多可能真正讀者愈少,而寄得愈多只會令更多ISP拒收將來的電郵。如企業將大量電郵發放服務外判,則更應留意以上各點,以免效果適得其反。
要達到最佳的推廣效果,電郵推廣人員除了要考慮基本的《非應邀電子訊息條例》外,更重要的是要真正地從接收者的角度去從新思考。
江城子 – 乙卯正月二十日夜記夢 – 蘇軾
十年生死兩茫茫,
不思量,自難忘。
千里孤墳,無處話淒涼。
縱使相逢應不識,
塵滿面,鬢如霜。
夜來幽夢忽還鄉,
小軒窗,正梳妝。
相顧無言,惟有淚千行。
料得年年腸斷處,
明月夜,短松岡。
江城子 – 廢墟下的自述 – 王兆山
一位廢墟中的地震遇難者,冥冥之中感知了地震之後地面上發生的一切,遂發出如是感慨:
天災難避死何訴,
主席喚,總理呼,
黨疼國愛,聲聲入廢墟。
十三億人共一哭,
縱做鬼,也幸福。
銀鷹戰車救雛犢,
左軍叔,右警姑,
民族大愛,親歷死也足。
只盼墳前有屏幕,
看奧運,同歡呼。
江城子 – 討賊 – 幽幽鹿鳴
山崩地裂生命危,
瓦礫堆,添新鬼,
遭此浩劫,欲哭已無淚。
貪官污吏人前跪,
丟面子,保爵位。
高門官宅毫未損,
百姓苦,誰解味。
家破人亡,文匪猶秀嘴。
搖頭晃腦欺天罪,
沒人性,千刀碎!
江城子 – 王兆山自白 – 大牛
山河失色蒼生號,
千萬戶,清淚掉,
趁機幫閑,能把仕途搞。
活人難欺鬼不叫,
急揮筆,替鬼表。
黨疼國愛太美妙,
生不悲,死還笑,
生離死別,宛若中彩票。
媚上不惜是非倒,
再無恥,不計較。
江城子 – 和王兆山 – 長安浪子
天災臨世萬民苦,
孤兒啼,寡婦哭,
中華兒女,含淚共祈福。
十三億人相扶助,
此天劫,吾共渡。
兆山拍馬悅官府,
喪汝心,忘汝祖,
屍海死寂,亡靈怎歡呼!
顯示器前網友怒,
恨不能,碎汝骨!
江城子 – 咒王兆山 – 巴渝痴人
最是無恥王兆山,
狗娘養,混人間。
汶川地震,苟活齊魯邊。
名為作協副主席,
辱斯文,羞祖宗。
胡言亂語發心瘋,
貪立功,表愚忠。
天良喪盡,冷指豈萬千。
舉頭三尺有神明,
祭汝頭,定寰中。
願失去至愛的人能走過這哀痛漫長的路。
也願在天災中受傷的人能積極面對人生。你們給所有人都上了一課。
道德觀念是整體社會價值取向的反映,但不能本末倒置,不能以大部份人的道德標準去批判小部份人的選擇。先有小眾而後有大眾。法律已反映了整體社會的道德觀念,藝人有權合法地選擇他們喜歡的私生活方式及對攝影的興趣等等。
每個人都虛偽,藝人受更大懲罰
我們說藝人虛偽,但試想想我們每一個人工作及生活中都是否有某程度上的虛偽?為甚麼藝人不可以虛偽?藝人的工作一部份就是要塑造形像去迎合大眾的品味,正如別人塑造一個勤力形像給老闆看一樣。也許有人會說藝人對社會有較大影響力所以對他們的道德要求應更高,但我想這事情應該這樣看:藝人形象破滅的成本比其他人高很多,如果他們還選擇冒險則自然要承擔更大的後果,正如現在已發生了的事情一樣。市埸是不需要道德教化的,因為道德存在於每個人各自的心中,每個人會有自己的判斷能力。當然,此事大部份人也認為相關藝人虛偽,但請謹記我們每個人也有不同程度的虛偽,只不過藝人受到了更大的懲罰。
網民傳媒沒有錯
但網民有錯嗎?藝人工作的首要成功因素就是要令市民對他們產生興趣,也因此市民才對他們的照片特別留意。我相信大部份藝人也明白此點:他們不可能要求市民只單單對他們的演唱會及電映及代言產品等等產生興趣。大部份對藝人有興趣的市民是對藝人的所有東西都感興趣,這也是藝人的市場價值所在,也是狗仔隊及八掛新聞存在的原因。好奇乃人性,網民也是人,自然對藝人的照片有更大的好奇心爭相傳閱。此現象中外皆然。
傳媒的報導又有錯嗎?的確傳媒對事件有大影響力,但報導公眾關注的事情是傳媒的天職,也是傳媒的生存之道。某些報導在市場有生存空間是因為有讀者,不是因為某些道德會等小數人批核。某淫照特刊大賣,我們只可以說公眾對事件很感興趣,但不能說傳媒或讀者不道德,因為道德只有公眾及讀者有資格判斷。此只不過是簡單邏輯。
制度的錯
唯一做錯的是警方對此事的不公平處理。但設身處地想想,警方也面對一些政治壓力令他們用更大力道去阻止事件鬧大從而避免令政府威信掃地,而這更大的力道正正是出現處事不公平的原因。當一個政府不是由市民授權,市民自會對它更大力的鞭撻,市民自會對警方的不公平處事手法有更大的迴響。但這政府只對小部份有權有勢的人負責,我們又如何有可能期望它以大眾市民認同的方式處事?這些不公平的事可以預期陸續有來。
試想想,如果政府是市民一人一票選出來,這件事不會只是個別藝人的不幸事件嗎?
Public broadcasting, or broadcasting funded by public money, is seen to be one of the cornerstones of a plural society. The logic is that broadcasting should accommodate different political views, different interests, and different tastes for contents. If we allow the use of frequency spectrum, a scarce resource, to be driven purely by commercial interests, it would only skew the content to those preferred by the taste of the majority, defeating plurality of content. For example, the Commercial Radio, driven by advertising revenue, would not offer a channel to broadcast Classical Music.
However, establishment funded by public money usually would be inefficient. RTHK is funded by the government at more than 400 million HKD per year. Whether this fund is efficiently used is debatable as we do not have an apple-to-apple comparison, but by common sense it would create efficiency problems when this kind of establishment is protected from competition.
Some may argue that this wastage, if any, is well worth it for the noble purpose of a plural society, provided that its editorial independence is protected by legislation. But I would argue that such legislation is not realistic nor can it be actually put to practice in HK by the current ruling regime. We’ve been hearing such concepts, like one of our NPC delegates often touting that “Broadcasting funded by government money should promote government policy”. While that delegate either lacked the right perspective to public broadcasting or he was driven by some political motives, we can derive that a system of a broadcasting funded by government would be influenced by such political cohorts.
By advancement of technology, the scarcity argument of frequency spectrum will not stand either. Digital broadcasting technology would enable a lot more channels to be delivered via the same spectral resource. Also, the AM channel is not crowded at all. As I learned from a spectrum specialist, the radio spectrum was assigned inefficiently where many of them are owned by government departments but rarely used. Releasing such dormant frequencies both in the AM and FM band, coupled with digital technology, frequencies will not be as scarce as it used to be. One additional note to put here is that our FM band is actually crowded by a lot of radio stations transmitted from the mainland. You can easily find those channels on your car radio.
I believe that the right direction to solve the above problems is to allow a lot more station frequencies to be available by open bidding, and enable a low entry barrier to the broadcasting business. We already have two commercial broadcasting service providers. RTHK is a good establishment with its history and contents. It owns substantial infrastructure to provide broadcasting services too and its transition to a commercially run entity shouldn’t be very difficult.
I believe that the following arrangement shall be the best route to broadcasting of HK.
1. Privatize RTKH and allow it to run as a commercial broadcasting entity. Such privatization could be by means of an IPO to the public. Money to the treasury.
2. Open up the broadcasting infrastructure market to allow more operators to participate, to provide technically advanced transmission services to radio stations. License fees go to the treasury.
3. Rearrange the frequency spectrum to allow more, a lot more, available frequency bands for broadcasting. Assignment of use of right to such frequencies should be by open bidding. Money to the treasury again.
4. The bidding and payment arrangements should be arranged such that entry barrier should be minimized.
It might be argued that such would not leave room for motives that are short of money, like Classical Music, Politics, or may be The Voice of Blue Collars, etc. However, I believe that if the frequency spectrum is abundant enough, there will be a viable commercial incentive for a station (may be named Alternative Voice?) to exist to cater for those niche markets. Please provide some inputs to this point though.
[IN RESPONSE TO THE POST OF MR. LAI]
The 9-year compulsory education might impose some incentive for students to “defer” their own graduation from Form 3, but I guess those are minority in numbers ? However, a true school voucher system do indeed address some of the “Minimum Wage” problems that you raised.
The essential spirit of school voucher is to assign public money to the hands of parents and students for them to choose their schools, where each school competes for those money. This implies that schools would have the freedom to choose their service offerings to the market, set their own prices, offer their own salary levels to teachers, assign teachers of different capability to different duties, etc. I guess a significant portion of kindergarten education works like that.
This is just like all schools turn into privately run education service providers where they can run for their own profit. Inefficient schools that nobody choose to use their service will be eliminated from the market, where good schools will thrive with a profit. Better off families may even pay more in addition to the voucher money to bid for better education. Some equality fanatics might argue that good education will be more accessible to rich families. But the point is that, with the current “equality” system, we are “evenly poor” instead of “all gets rich where somebody gets even richer”.
Yes I understand these are too radical for the current system. However, I guess even if with the current constraints of “fixed education funding” for each student, Minimum Wage of teachers etc, a simple version of the school voucher system will improve the secondary school education given that schools can be allowed to expand and contract in their scale, choose the method of education and management in their own way, and teachers can switch job to different schools easily. Efficient schools will be encouraged to recruit more teachers and expand their student population to the point where they can still keep parents choosing them, and inefficient schools will be punished.
Of course, I am not in the education business so the above are bound to be flawed or might be impractical to implement. But we need brainstorming here…
I was told that the money spent on University education for each university graduate is about the same as the tuition fee of top notch universities in the world. I think if the government is willing to hand the funds to the students, they will be very motivated to try to get to schools like Harvard/Yale/Cambridge etc.
[ADDITIONAL NOTE]
There is one additional point I would like to add to this, inspired by a teacher recently.
The teacher complained that his effort is not appreciated by students at all. They often fall asleep in class, and make jokes on teachers. He has difficulty putting the class in order, let alone teaching. He is very demotivated, mainly because of students’ behavior, and partly because of the heavy administrative work that he is burdened with.
So, is it students’ fault of not putting enough effort to their study? I would say not exactly. I lived life for many years and I saw that many of the students that were classified as poorly performing and erratically behaving turned out to be fine human beings. I was one of them indeed, who was rebellion and refused to do my own homework. But I think I classify to be good citizen, eventually.
I think the culprit is the choice of methods of learning. If you’ve ever been a secondary school student in HK, you know what it is about. You learned the text but were discouraged of your own interpretation. You would not be welcomed to challenge the defined line of thinking for a piece of literature (For example, I always think 出師表 is a good material to study the slavery inclination of Chinese, but that won’t help my score). You were asked to memorize stuffs. You need to take biology together with mathematics in order to graduate from form 5 even if you hate biology. You would be damned if you challenge the Keynesian method of boosting the economy by what you read on your brother’s Hayek book, because that was not on the curriculum. If you failed English, your other distinctions won’t count!!
No, I am not saying that students need not share their part of the problem, but rather we should think rationally – students are just human and there must be a reason why they choose to sleep instead of learning in class. Teachers, while blaming students not putting enough effort, should also think about why those students choose to behave that way.
Would a liberal education market help solve the above problem ?
After posting the Minimum Wage article on my facebook account, I’ve got the following post from my high school teacher Mr. Lai Kwok Kin, who has now chosen to retire early.
[POST OF MR. LAI]
Minumum wage would mean heavier workload, until the effect of paying more to per employee is offset by the effect of reducing the number of employees.
Take Szeto Wah as an example. He lead teachers to fight for a pay scale that is linked to the nurses, which according to Szeto some 30 years ago, had the same level of professional qualification and therefore should be paid the same. When Government agreed to this, at the same time the teachers’ workload was increased constantly until in the recent years there has been a high suicide rate of teachers. Everybody knows, that the number of hours that the average HK teacher spends inside classrooms is the highest in the World, and the time that each average HK teacher can spare on other aspects on kids (preparing lessons, talking to kids outside classrooms, etc.) is the smallest in the World. The workload of teachers has further been increased through a series of “value-adding” campaigns, like requiring teachers to do administrative work (so as to reduce the number of general office staff) and to request teachers to take up more counselling work (so as to reduce the number of social workers), and through “mainstreaming” schools, or in simple terms, merge special schools with “normal” schools, so as to reduce the number of special schools and the number of special school teachers. And to ensure that teachers are actually achieving more goals as a result of these added tasks, schools have to go through External School Review every few years.
All these amounted to a near to intolerable workload and pressure on teachers. At present, according to surveys, on average about 10% of teachers in each and every school is depressed and have thought of committing suicide. In other words, in a standard school where there are about 55 teachers, 5 – 6 of them are thinking of committing suicide. And the education and future of our kids are now under the hands of such an unstable and vulnerable workforce.
If there is no minumum wage, schools would be able to negotiate with teachers to pay each less, and hire more teachers subsequently. The quality of education would be raised, the teachers would not need to work long hours under pressure, and the spouse and childern of these teachers would be better taken care of. At present, quite a number of graduates from the Institute of Education are not able to find a job because the schools cannot share the resources with more people who needed the jobs (before Fanny Law left the EMB – now EDB – she advocated that more teachers could share a smaller number of “posts” – but she never worked out the details).
What happened in the education sector can be viewed as a life example for the possible consequencies of imposing a minimum wage on each given post.
All policies that seem to do good to the people might carry backwashes. For example, the 85000 housing policy of Tung was meant to help middle-lower class people to purchase their own homes, but the sour results that rapidly turned out was what all everyone could see and had to suffer. Before making any hastely decision, I do think that taking possible backwashes into consideration would be wise.
[MY RESPONSE]
thank you Mr. Lai you gave us a good insight …
Free market believers think that any price control distorts the market and cripples its ability to automatically maximise the use of resources to achieve maximum satisfaction and output. In this particular case, the price control was on salary of teachers, and teachers could not have their job satisfaction which by your quoted figure they might be in a very poor situation, and the Government could not manage to produce the output as expected by tax payers either. All parties lose.
I think your highlight of the fact that 10% of teachers had the thought of committing suicide is particularly scary. Satisfaction is one thing that is not easily measurable in economic terms, but this 10% figure is way too high and I think it reflects the dire situation that teachers face.
Mr. Lai, Do you think school voucher is the right direction to go to solve the problem ?
[FURTHER REPONSE OF MR. LAI]
Dear Lento,
Thank you for your compliment – I just portraited what I have seen as a teacher. It’s a sad thing to see that the education of HK is so much distorted by the Government.
Personally I think school voucher is something that worths trying, though I cannot see what backwash it may bring. At presentthe education system serves the parents and the children “well” in the sense that parents can leave their children in the system virtually as long as they can, and children can also evade entering into the workiforce by virtually staying in the education system forever. At present we have a 9-year “compulsory education”, which means children can get educated for 9 years for free, or complete up to F3 for free, which ever the later. In other words, a student can repeat 10 years F1, repeat 10 years F2 and repeat 10 years F3 and stay in the school campus up to 42 years old. With such a situation, children (especially the low achievers, either because of low ability or low motivation or low diligence) tend to achieve lower academically in order not to be promoted to a higher form level and hence forced to leave school and become a member of the workforce. In this sense, the education system can be seen as pulling the hind leg of the children in their academic achievement, as well as the forword momentum of the HK society as a whole.
If each child can only use a fixed quantity of school vouchers in his / her life, the child (who eventually becomes a grown-up) would need to consider carefully how the vouchers should be utilized, instead of wasting it in repeating F1 for many years. Then the children would be able to see the consequences of wasting their opportunities of being educated and would likely (hopefully) be better motivated to achieve well during their schooling, and thus may be better benefited through the education process, and at a lower cost for the society.
So to answer your question, apart from the backwash that I can yet not foresee, I do think that school voucher is right direction to solve the education problem in HK – though seems that it is not much related to the fixed salary – high worload+low satisfaction – low efficiency+depression problem of teachers.
Election Committee Members are entitled to elect the National Peoples Congress representative for HK. I have exercised my voting right in representation of my voters, and I would like to share with you these observations.
1. The voting rule demands that each ballot would need to pick exactly 36 out of the 50 candidates. The design of this rule would rule out all democratic candidates from being elected. Minority voice would not have a seat.
2. The vote counting was completely opaque. Candidates are not allowed to observe the counting process, let alone challenging it. For Legco and District Council elections in HK, we went through the process of examining those problem votes (for example, the ink was filled out of the margin, the ballot was damaged, etc) in front of candidates or their agents. But there was no such thing for NPC election, and the interesting thing was no body intended to complain at all. Different culture ? I would say not.
3. The 36 winning seats were casted about 1100 to 861 votes. The interesting thing was that the 37th had about 856 casts, 5 short from the 36th, or less than 0.5% of the total 1200 votes. If it were elections in HK, a complete re-examination of the ballots could be warranted.
But I must say it was fun to learn about the culture of NPC elections, and the ballot counting process, let alone its transparency problem, was very efficient and fast.
My personal opinion concerning Minimum Wage, and an overly-simple but demonstrative analysis why Minimum Wage does no good to people, and one possible alternative.
My believe is:
” 最低工資立法不會令所有人得到最低工資,只會令不值最低工資的人失業。 ”
” Minimum Wage does NOT mean that workers would all get a raise to that Minimum. It looks more likely to mean that workers NOT WORTH that Minimum will BECOME unemployed ”
=== Assumptions ===
We believe that the following assumptions are true for the lower-income groups in HK.
1. The groups of people earning low income are unskilled workers, for example, hygiene workers, street cleaners, etc.
2. Their mobility from the hygiene industry to another industry is low because of skill set constraints.
3. There is no monopoly in those markets, i.e. no single company dominate the hygiene business.
4. The market Rate for each unit of cleaning output is roughly uniform, e.g. if keeping 1000 square feet of area clean is worth X dollars, then keeping 2000 square feet clean would worth 2X dollars.
(We welcome opinions against the assumptions above. Note that by Rate we mean the market rate of each unit of cleaning output, where by Wage refers to the income of a hygiene worker measured in a fixed period of time)
=== Analysis ===
By the above assumptions, the market clearing Rate for hygiene services would be the Rate such that the number of units of cleaning output willing to work at that Rate equals the number of units of cleaning output that employers willing to employ at that Rate.
So, what is the effect of minimum Wage legislation?
1. Minimum wage means the minimum income of a worker. But the assumptions above implied that it is the Rate that matters. So, if a worker is not efficient enough to provide sufficient amount of output to cover the raised Wage, he/she will become unemployed. Therefore, the most unprivileged and inefficient will be shredded from the employable net, but this group is exactly what we wanted to help by the “minimum wage”.
2. Because of the above, the employable amount of labor for hygiene services would be reduced, therefore pushing up the Rate. At this increased Rate, it has two effects working against each other (i) firms will demand less hygiene services, therefore reducing total output of this sector (ii) the increased Rate would attract people coming into this business, but increased supply would push the Rate back to what it was.
3. As could be guessed from above, a minimum wage policy effectively imposes a ‘contractionary’ effect on output of sectors that needed boosting or expansion.
Conclusion? Minimum wage would simply work against its ‘noble’ purpose of helping the low income groups of people. It would reduce total output of those sectors instead. To put it in an overly simple but demonstrative way, Minimum Wage does NOT mean that workers would all get a raise to that Minimum. It looks more likely to mean that workers NOT WORTH that Minimum will BECOME unemployed.
=== Alternative ? ===
We don’t think the vision of the government and all the political parties is that narrow. To meet the ends of sustaining output while increasing the employability of low income groups, why don’t we look into a Tax Credit system?
A tax credit system is simple, that it subsidizes people falling under a certain income level (negative income tax). For example, if a person earns X per month and X is less than HK$6000, then the government subsidizes (6000-X) * 0.8.
A tax credit system would have these positive benefits, taking the hygiene sector as example again.
1. It shifts the supply curve of hygiene labor to the right because an employee, after adding the tax credit, would think about working at a lower net payment by the employer.
2. The shift of the supply curve to the right would reduce the Rate as paid by employers. At this reduced Rate, the demand for hygiene services would increase. This would increase total output of the hygiene sector, more people get employed.
3. Instead of shredding off the most unprivileged as in the “minimum wage”, a tax credit system would increase the employability of the under-privileged.
4. In contrary to the ‘contractionary’ effect of minimum wage on low income sectors, a tax credit system has expansionary effect on those such sectors.
In short, if we want to help the under-privileged, we need to get them employed. Only when they continue to have jobs could they learn new skills and progress to higher productivity.
Sole reference: www.wikipedia.com